The history of the split between Rugby League and Rugby Union is complex and contentious. The two sports have gone their separate ways since 1895, a division that has had a lasting impact on both sides of the sport. In this blog section, we'll explore the history of the split, examining the causes and effects of the division.
The roots of the division can be traced back to the late 19th century, when the sport of football was growing in popularity in England. At that time, there were two distinct forms of football being played: Rugby Union, which was largely played by amateur teams, and Rugby League, which was a more professional sport. The two sides were at odds over various issues, such as pay, player registration, and amateur versus professional play.
The tension between the two sides reached a boiling point in 1895, when 21 clubs in the North of England formed the Northern Rugby Football Union, a professional rival to the Rugby Football Union, which was the governing body of Rugby Union. The formation of the Northern Union caused a rift between the two sports, as the Northern Union wanted to make changes to the rules and regulations of the game that the Rugby Football Union refused to accept. This led to the two sides becoming completely separate entities, and the split between Rugby League and Rugby Union was born.
The effects of the split were far-reaching. The two sports developed different rules and regulations, and the two sides of the game became increasingly distinct. Rugby League quickly became a more professional sport, with teams featuring paid players, while Rugby Union maintained its amateur status. The two sports also developed different fan bases, with Rugby League becoming popular in the industrial North of England, while Rugby Union remained popular in the South. The two sides of the sport remain distinct to this day, with both sides having unique rules and regulations, and distinct fan bases.
The split between Rugby League and Rugby Union has had a lasting impact on the sport. While the two sides of the game remain distinct, there have been some attempts to bridge the gap in recent years, such as the formation of the Rugby Football League in 1995. Nevertheless, the division between the two sports remains strong, and the history of the split is still a contentious topic.
The split between Rugby Union and Rugby League in 1895 had a significant impact on the sport and is still felt today. But why did the two codes of rugby diverge in the first place? To understand the lasting effects of the split, it’s important to understand the conditions that led to it.
The main issue that caused the separation between Rugby Union and League was the issue of payments. At the time, Rugby Union clubs had a strict amateur ethos, while Rugby League clubs were becoming increasingly professionalised. This meant that Rugby League teams were able to pay their players, while Rugby Union teams were not. This led to some of the best players in the country leaving Rugby Union to join Rugby League teams and get paid for their efforts.
This caused a huge split between the two codes, with each developing its own distinct style of play. Rugby League became a much faster and more open game, while Rugby Union remained a more conservative and structured game. The split also had social implications, with Rugby League becoming a working-class game and Rugby Union remaining the domain of the middle and upper classes.
Today, the split between the two codes is still felt. Rugby League and Rugby Union remain two distinct sports, with different rules, styles of play and fanbases. The split has also had a lasting impact on the international game, with Rugby Union now the dominant code on the world stage. Nevertheless, the impact of the split is still felt today, and it’s important to understand the conditions that led to it.
Comments